4 or -5 dB thus peaking higher after normalisation than song one. Turning on normalisation will adjust the volume of the whole track by -9dBīrother Moon (Live) - Gungor also peaks at 0dB but has significantly more dynamics over all turning on normalisation will adjust the volume by approx. Salt - The devil Wears Prada peaks at 0dB and is squashed like a tomato run over by a dump truck. The 3 songs I used all differ from overall loudness. I have been trying out the normalization and have some observations:
#MP3 NORMALIZER FOR IPHONE TV#
It certainly doesn’t appear to be using compression or limiting, so to answer the original question, I don’t think you will experience unexpected variances in volume throught a track - it seems to apply it equally across the entire track (so it’s not like a TV or home theater system that flattens-out the volume dynamically and creates unexpected shifts in volume as the compressor tries to keep up).įor those who visit this thread and are still looking for some answers.
That said, actually given they’re all similarly-”loud” perceptually, maybe you’re actually using a loudness-normalisation method that isn’t very effective? Because I would assume the amplitude is already normalised after being compressed, in the mastering process (they’re all relatively-modern recordings).
Yet if I turn off “Normalize Audio” the “loudness” is fairly equal. For example, play the below 4 x tracks and you will find that Morningstart by Baroness is significantly “louder”. It seems it’s using stock-standard amplitude-normalisation. For example, which of the following is the Windows Desktop “Normalize Audio” feature using? I’m still interested in the answer to the original question.
0 kommentar(er)
